Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 12

Ethics - Essay ExampleWalzer approaches the moral philosophy of state of war using Utilitarianism. The hypothesis approaches ethics by defining morals by use of actions. The actions can be used to define what is unlawful or right. In theory, an action that yields beneficial consequences is as right or moral while actions leadership to negative results are as wrong. The theory is the consequentialist theory because it focuses on the outcome of actions rather than the action themselves. The theory holds that any action is by the extent of benefits or harms it is within the society. According to the theory, the greater good mover greater happiness, and the moral duty of the individual is to maximize human happiness. The problem with the theory is the development of individuality, and supporting the use of immoral actions to achieve success. According to Walzer, the humanitarian approach employed in the world has non been successful due to the several challenges associated with hu man behavior. In fact, the society is into the right wing and the liberal as recorded in the book Arguing About War. The 20th century is with a simple lesson on politics, which focuses on motivation for political action. The most lethal concept in the era is the ideology which is disparate from the accepted or focus on the interests of the nation. The desire for wealth or money, power ignoble and devotees to the crook excess are the product of shifting ideologies. In fact, the challenge in the society is the war amongst values or values against social pressures and desire for wealth and money. The development of the concept of international bail is a product of the war study and its effect on the society. The book by Walzer covers the contemporary issues associated with war and the impact of the various issues and the role of humanitarian discourse. It describes accurately, the challenges faced by country and organization seeking to helper or support the society and the impact of global politics in the whole process. Humanitarian intervention is an armed intervention without agreement of the other state to which the invasion occurs. In fact, it focuses on combating humanitarian casualty rather than invasion based on countrys interest. The focus of the humanitarian intervention is to grip or reduce large-scale ravishment of human rights with the focus being on stopping the violation of human rights. The challenge posed by the process is massive. However, Michael Walzer states that human intervention is when it responds to the need of the citizens or acts that impact moral conscience of mankind. In other words, states cannot kill or attack citizens from other states legitimately, not as yet within their borders are they allowed to do the same. Despite the existence of justifiable ground for humanitarian intervention, the level or point at which human intervention occurs is an issue of great debate. In fact, agreement has never been reached on whether t o have a standard approach or evaluate the situations independently. However, according to Walzer human intervention has improve the level of security and protection of human rights within the society. The first obligation of the government is to offer security, still it may become unattainable leading to the need for humanitarian intervention. After the world war, the world plunged into a state of uncertainty. Instead of peace, there were minor conflicts within the states leading to genocide and social cleansing. However, the challenge of the new threats led to the development of various approaches to